A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design works at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to create their relatives house. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has since come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were intended to gather Visible evidence on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times described, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children house in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out based upon professional suggestions and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your problem that many observers see as more and more frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Specialist backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the Actual physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other lengthy after the legal expenses are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of Accountant Paul Feely the case increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.